35 on file · 17 became law · 4 still moving · 0 moved in 30 days
CaliforniaWould require employers to give notice about automated decision systems used in employment decisions and bar retaliation against workers who assert their rights, enforced by the Labor Commissioner.
CaliforniaThis bill would have protected nurses from disciplinary action when overriding unsafe artificial intelligence clinical recommendations.
CaliforniaWould require Cal/WARN layoff notices to disclose when a mass layoff, relocation or termination is caused in whole or substantial part by AI or other automated technology.
CaliforniaThis bill prohibits employers from using artificial intelligence systems to autonomously terminate workers.
CaliforniaWould bar employers from using AI workplace surveillance tools to collect neural data or recognize workers' emotional states, with civil penalties of up to $500 per violation.
CaliforniaCalifornia enacted a law that prohibits employers from relying on artificial intelligence for certain employment decisions.
United States (federal)A House bill in Congress, now in committee. Latest step: Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Science, Space, and Technology, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee.
European UnionSets EU-wide risk-based rules for AI systems, banning certain practices, imposing requirements on high-risk systems, transparency duties for some AI, and obligations for general-purpose AI model providers.
European UnionAmends the AI Act to delay high-risk obligations to 2 December 2027 and 2 August 2028, extend SME relief to small mid-caps, simplify AI literacy and registration duties, widen AI Office oversight, and ban AI nudification and CSAM generation.
European UnionDraft Commission guidelines under Article 6(5) of the AI Act with practical examples of AI systems that should or should not be classified as high-risk, published for consultation before formal adoption.
IllinoisBars teachers from using AI tools to generate evidence of professional practice used in their evaluations and limits AI use in the teacher evaluation process.
ColoradoWould have banned using surveillance data and algorithms to set individualized prices for consumers or wages for workers.
ConnecticutSets safety protocols for AI chatbots with extra protections for minors, whistleblower protections for frontier AI developer employees, disclosure duties for AI products and labeling of AI-generated material.
ColoradoRepeals and replaces the 2024 Colorado AI Act with notice, explanation, human review and correction rights for consumers affected by automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions.
ColoradoRequired developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to use reasonable care to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination in consequential decisions.
MinnesotaWould regulate employers' use of automated decision systems in hiring and other employment decisions.
MinnesotaWould require employers to give notice and a transitional employment period to employees displaced by artificial intelligence, with penalties.
MinnesotaWould prohibit companies from using data obtained through observation, inference or surveillance to set individualized prices for customers or wages for employees, with exceptions for loyalty programs and group discounts.
CaliforniaWould have required employers to notify workers about automated decision systems used for employment decisions and to give notice when relying primarily on such systems for discipline or termination.
KentuckyWould have restricted licensed professionals from using artificial intelligence in providing therapy and psychotherapy services.
MaineRegulates employer electronic surveillance of employees to protect workers.
MassachusettsWould set consumer protection requirements for interactions with AI systems.
FloridaWould have required a state bureau to study the effect of automation, AI and robotics on Florida employment.
ConnecticutWould have regulated high-risk AI systems used in consequential decisions and created other AI provisions; it passed the Senate but not the House.
Rhode IslandWould require developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems used in consequential decisions to use reasonable care against algorithmic discrimination and conduct impact assessments.
VirginiaWould have required developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination, with civil penalties enforced by the Attorney General.
MarylandWould have required developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to use reasonable care to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination.
European UnionCreates a legal presumption of employment for people working through digital labour platforms and sets the first EU rules on algorithmic management, including human oversight of automated decisions and limits on processing workers' personal data.
United States (federal)A House resolution in Congress, now in committee. Latest step: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
CaliforniaMakes contract terms allowing a digital replica of a performer's voice or likeness in new performances unenforceable when specified protections, such as a reasonably specific description of uses and representation, are missing.
IllinoisAmends the Illinois Human Rights Act to bar employers from using AI that has a discriminatory effect in employment decisions, including using zip codes as a proxy for protected classes, and to require notice to employees.
IllinoisMakes contract terms allowing the creation of a digital replica of a performer's voice or likeness unenforceable unless the use is reasonably described and the person was represented.
District of ColumbiaWould have barred users of algorithmic decision-making from making eligibility determinations in a discriminatory manner and required notices to affected individuals.
IllinoisRequires employers that use AI to analyze video job interviews to notify applicants, explain how the AI works, obtain consent and limit sharing of the videos.
New HampshireWould have regulated the use of artificial intelligence to provide services that require a professional license.
Legislationsby Glyph