Employment: Automated Decision Systems
Would require employers to give notice about automated decision systems used in employment decisions and bar retaliation against workers who assert their rights, enforced by the Labor Commissioner.
80 on file · 65 became law · 0 still moving · 0 moved in 30 days
Would require employers to give notice about automated decision systems used in employment decisions and bar retaliation against workers who assert their rights, enforced by the Labor Commissioner.
This bill would have protected nurses from disciplinary action when overriding unsafe artificial intelligence clinical recommendations.
This bill would have prohibited artificial intelligence algorithms from providing or advertising therapy services.
Would recast the California AI Transparency Act, removing the user threshold for covered providers and replacing AI detection tools with disclosure verification tools, as an urgency statute.
Would clarify that the right of publicity and false impersonation laws cover digital replicas of a person's voice or likeness.
Would require Cal/WARN layoff notices to disclose when a mass layoff, relocation or termination is caused in whole or substantial part by AI or other automated technology.
The executive order increases safety oversight and requires independent verification of artificial intelligence systems.
Would require developers and deployers of AI clinical decision support systems to make reasonable efforts to identify systems with a foreseeable risk of biased impacts and to disclose intended uses and risks.
Would limit the use of AI in psychotherapy services to administrative or supplementary support and bar training models on psychotherapy data in ways inconsistent with confidentiality law.
Would require pornographic website operators to take reasonable steps to ensure displayed and uploaded sexually explicit content does not include individuals who did not consent or were minors.
This bill prohibits employers from using artificial intelligence systems to autonomously terminate workers.
This bill would have regulated wearable technology devices to address privacy concerns.
Would bar employers from using AI workplace surveillance tools to collect neural data or recognize workers' emotional states, with civil penalties of up to $500 per violation.
California enacted a law that prohibits employers from relying on artificial intelligence for certain employment decisions.
Would bar large businesses from representing a customer service chatbot as human and require them to offer access to a human agent, generally within 15 minutes of a request.
Would expand the CCPA right to delete to all personal information a business has collected about a consumer and require businesses to offer an online method for submitting privacy requests.
Would shorten the Delete Act processing cycle for data brokers from 45 to 30 days and require notice to elected officials and judges that they can use the deletion mechanism.
Bars CEQA categorical exemptions for data center projects and lets the governor certify qualifying data center projects as environmental leadership development projects.
Requires the Public Utilities Commission to assess rate structures so that data centers pay a reasonable share of transmission, distribution and procurement costs tied to their loads.
Requires data center owners or operators to report information such as location, size, power usage effectiveness and onsite generator fuel use to the California Energy Commission.
Bars cities and counties from approving permits for new or expanded data centers unless the applicant provides prescribed water use information and other conditions are met.
Requires each electrical corporation to file transmission, distribution and generation service tariffs for participating data center customers.
Requires data center operators to give their water supplier a good faith estimate of expected water use and water source before applying for a local business license or permit.
Makes it an unlawful advertising practice to publish an ad that prominently includes a synthetic performer without a clear and conspicuous disclosure.
Requires companion chatbot operators, beginning July 1, 2027, to perform and document child safety risk assessments and meet other child safety duties before offering new or substantially modified chatbots in California.
Bars covered platforms from providing addictive features to users under 16, with Attorney General enforcement, and creates an e-Safety Advisory Commission in the Department of Justice.
Repeals the enjoined Age-Appropriate Design Code Act and replaces it with similar duties requiring online services likely to be accessed by children to take reasonable steps to prevent specified risks of harm.
Amends the Digital Age Assurance Act to revise how operating systems collect age information and send age signals to app stores and app developers.
Expands social media platform reporting duties for child sexual abuse material to cover intimate depictions of identifiable minors and makes noncompliant platforms liable to depicted individuals.
Bans the manufacture or sale in California of toys that include a companion chatbot until January 1, 2031.
Requires the Government Operations Agency to create an AI Auditor Registry by January 1, 2029 and bars unregistered AI auditors from conducting covered AI audits.
Would regulate the development and deployment of automated decision systems used to make consequential decisions about people.
Would have required companion chatbot operators to perform annual child safety risk assessments and audits, with Attorney General reporting and a private right of action for harmed children.
Would require generative AI developers to provide a way for rights owners to request information about the developer's use of their copyrighted materials in training.
Requires data brokers to register with the California Privacy Protection Agency and to process consumer deletion requests submitted through a single state-run deletion mechanism.
Requires businesses engaged in digital financial asset activity with California residents to obtain a license from the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.
Would have required the Public Utilities Commission to establish a special electricity rate structure for data centers.
Requires online services likely to be accessed by children to assess and mitigate risks to children and to configure default privacy settings to a high level of privacy.
Would have required employers to notify workers about automated decision systems used for employment decisions and to give notice when relying primarily on such systems for discipline or termination.
Would have clarified that false impersonation and right of publicity laws cover AI digital replicas and required AI tools that create them to display a consumer warning about unlawful use.
Would have made social media platforms liable when their algorithms relay content in violation of state civil rights and personal rights laws, or when they aid or abet such violations.
Would have barred making a companion chatbot available to a child unless it was not foreseeably capable of harms such as encouraging self-harm, suicidal ideation, violence or disordered eating.
Would have required data center operators to give their water supplier an estimate of expected water use before applying for a local business license.
Regulations that give consumers rights to access and opt out of businesses' use of automated decisionmaking technology and require certain businesses to conduct risk assessments and annual cybersecurity audits.
Requires large generative AI providers to offer a free AI detection tool and to embed disclosures in AI-generated image, video and audio content.
Requires companion chatbot operators to disclose that the chatbot is AI, maintain protocols against suicide and self-harm content, add safeguards for known minors and report annually to the Office of Suicide Prevention.
Requires operating system providers to collect a user's age at account setup and send an age bracket signal to app stores and developers, beginning January 1, 2027.
Requires social media platforms to show users a black box warning when they first access the platform each day, after 3 hours of use and hourly after that, beginning January 1, 2027.
Bars a defendant who developed, modified or used artificial intelligence from arguing that the AI autonomously caused the harm to the plaintiff.
Delays the California AI Transparency Act to August 2, 2026 and adds content provenance duties for large online platforms from 2027 and capture device makers from 2028.