Protecting kids from deepfakes and exploitative images
Creates protections and penalties for deepfakes and other digitally created exploitative sexual images of minors.
203 on file · 142 became law · 23 still moving · 3 moved in 30 days
Creates protections and penalties for deepfakes and other digitally created exploitative sexual images of minors.
Requires disclosure of synthetic media, including AI-generated deepfakes, in election-related communications within a set period before an election.
Would have clarified that false impersonation and right of publicity laws cover AI digital replicas and required AI tools that create them to display a consumer warning about unlawful use.
Amends India's IT Rules 2021 to define synthetically generated information and require intermediaries to label AI-generated content, embed provenance metadata and act faster on unlawful deepfakes.
Would regulate deceptive synthetic media and misinformation about candidates and elections.
Creates a crime for disseminating deep fakes to influence an election, a crime for nonconsensual dissemination of sexual deep fakes, and a civil cause of action for victims of nonconsensual sexual deep fakes.
Reforms UK data protection law, creates frameworks for digital verification services and smart data, restructures the Information Commissioner's Office, adds an offence of creating or requesting intimate images of adults without consent, and requires government reports on copyright and AI.
Extends child sexual exploitation crimes to images that are morphed from or indistinguishable from a real child or generated without any actual child, and bars disseminating items that purport to depict an identifiable person.
Would have created crimes and enhanced penalties for illegal activities carried out using artificial intelligence, including AI-generated obscene material and deceptive election content.
Sets principles, a three-level risk classification, prohibited practices and machine-readable labeling of synthetic content for AI systems in Kazakhstan, and addresses copyright in AI-generated works.
Would create a federal civil remedy for people depicted in sexually explicit deepfakes made or shared without consent.
Would have replaced Georgia's obscene material involving children statute to cover computer-generated images.
Bans developing or deploying AI systems for certain intentional harms such as behavioral manipulation toward self-harm, unlawful discrimination, government social scoring and sexual deepfakes of minors, requires state agencies to disclose AI use to consumers, and creates an AI regulatory sandbox and the Texas Artificial Intelligence Council, enforced by the attorney general.
Requires election communications that include synthetic media to disclose that the image, video or audio has been manipulated and lets depicted candidates seek an injunction.
Creates a property right in an individual's name, voice and visual likeness, including digital depictions, and sets penalties for unauthorized use.
Requires prior consent before a deceased performer's digital replica is used in audiovisual works, sound recordings or live performances.
Requires advertisements to conspicuously disclose when they include an AI-generated synthetic performer, with civil penalties for violations.
Would create misdemeanor and felony offenses for nonconsensual distribution of sexually explicit images, video or audio created or altered with digital technology, including AI.
Requires large generative AI providers to offer a free AI detection tool and to embed disclosures in AI-generated image, video and audio content.
Delays the California AI Transparency Act to August 2, 2026 and adds content provenance duties for large online platforms from 2027 and capture device makers from 2028.
Expands civil liability for digitized sexually explicit material, including material depicting minors, and for services that knowingly enable deepfake pornography services to operate.
Makes it a crime to create or distribute real or digitally fabricated sexually explicit images of a person without consent.
Regulates deepfakes of candidates and parties in election and electioneering communications by requiring a disclosure and allowing injunctive relief and penalties.
Expands prohibitions relating to pornography involving minors and revises the penalties for those crimes.
Prohibits knowingly distributing materially deceptive AI-generated or digitally altered election content about candidates, officials and election workers within set periods around elections.
Campaign finance overhaul bill that Public Citizen tracks for its provisions on deepfakes in political communications.
Requires providers of AI generation services and content distribution platforms to add explicit visible labels and implicit metadata labels to AI-generated text, audio, images, video and virtual scenes, and bars removing or forging those labels.
Requires commercial websites and apps that offer tools to create artificial sexual material using real people's likenesses to verify users are adults, with civil penalties.
Creates a criminal offense for possessing, promoting or producing obscene visual material that appears to depict a child, including AI-generated or animated images.
Expands child sexual abuse material offenses to cover computer-generated and AI-altered images depicting children, including recognizable real children.
Sets the mandatory national technical standard for how explicit and implicit labels, including metadata, must be applied to AI-generated text, images, audio, video and virtual scenes under China's labeling measures.
Creates civil liability and expands criminal offenses for producing or distributing nonconsensual sexually explicit deepfake media and artificial intimate visual material, with an affirmative defense for AI application providers that prohibit and take steps to prevent such content.
Creates criminal and civil liability for financial exploitation or abuse carried out with artificially generated media or phishing communications.
Requires social media platforms to provide a way for users to report explicit deepfake material and to respond to and act on such reports on set timelines.
The court permanently enjoined California's AB 2655, which required platforms to block or label deceptive election deepfakes, as preempted by Section 230, and permanently enjoined AB 2839 against the plaintiffs.
Creates criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for creating or distributing AI-generated sexual images that falsely depict an identifiable person without consent.
Requires digital service providers to register users' ages, obtain parental consent for minors, limit collection of minors' data and mitigate harms to minors, and adds morphed images of children to the child exploitation crime.
Expands the crime of nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images to include fabricated images and defines computer-generated child sexual abuse material as a crime.
Public safety omnibus that expanded the definition of child sexual abuse material to include obscene images of individuals indistinguishable from actual minors created with generative artificial intelligence.
Imposes duties on user-to-user and search services to tackle illegal content and protect children, enforced by Ofcom through codes of practice, age assurance requirements and penalties.
Creates the crime of digital forgery for creating or spreading AI-generated or otherwise forged digital likenesses of a person with intent to defraud or injure.
Bars distributing deceptive synthetic media of candidates in election communications within a set period before an election unless it carries a disclosure, and lets affected candidates seek relief.
Senate companion regulating deceptive synthetic media of candidates in election communications, with a disclosure safe harbor and a private right of action.
Would make people liable for knowingly distributing campaign ads containing undisclosed deepfakes of candidates in the days before an election.
Would have broadened the offense of producing or distributing sexually explicit deepfakes from videos to any deepfake media, including images.
Would have required certain generative AI developers to embed provenance data in AI content and offer provenance readers.
Requires covered online platforms to set up a process to remove altered sexual depictions, including deepfakes, within 48 hours of a valid request from the depicted person.
Expands the crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image to cover digitally created, manipulated or altered images such as deepfakes.
Creates civil and criminal remedies for the nonconsensual disclosure of AI-generated or digitally altered intimate depictions of identifiable people.
Revises terminology for materials depicting minors in sexual conduct and prohibits possessing or distributing obscene material depicting a purported child, reaching computer-generated images.