AI Disclosure in Advertising Bill
Pennsylvania lawmakers passed legislation requiring advertisers to disclose the use of artificial intelligence in certain advertisements.
203 on file · 142 became law · 23 still moving · 3 moved in 30 days
Pennsylvania lawmakers passed legislation requiring advertisers to disclose the use of artificial intelligence in certain advertisements.
China proposed rules governing artificial intelligence that span data, computing, algorithms, deepfakes, and privacy.
A bill to make provision about a requirement for consent to generate a likeness of a person using, or with the assistance of, artificial intelligence; to make further provision relating to that requirement; to make provision about civil action in circumstances where that requirement is not met; to m
This bill prohibits applications that use artificial intelligence to generate fake nude images of real people.
This legislation limits the unauthorized use of artificial intelligence to produce deepfakes and digital replicas.
Would recast the California AI Transparency Act, removing the user threshold for covered providers and replacing AI detection tools with disclosure verification tools, as an urgency statute.
Would clarify that the right of publicity and false impersonation laws cover digital replicas of a person's voice or likeness.
Would require pornographic website operators to take reasonable steps to ensure displayed and uploaded sexually explicit content does not include individuals who did not consent or were minors.
Makes it an unlawful advertising practice to publish an ad that prominently includes a synthetic performer without a clear and conspicuous disclosure.
Sets EU-wide risk-based rules for AI systems, banning certain practices, imposing requirements on high-risk systems, transparency duties for some AI, and obligations for general-purpose AI model providers.
Commission guidelines on Article 50 of the AI Act clarifying who must disclose AI interactions, mark AI-generated content in machine-readable form, and label deepfakes and certain AI-generated text.
Bars websites, apps and services from letting users nudify images or videos of identifiable people and from advertising such tools, with a private right of action and attorney general civil penalties up to $500,000 per violation.
Amends the AI Act to delay high-risk obligations to 2 December 2027 and 2 August 2028, extend SME relief to small mid-caps, simplify AI literacy and registration duties, widen AI Office oversight, and ban AI nudification and CSAM generation.
Creates South Korea's comprehensive AI framework, with a national AI strategy committee and basic plan, industry support, and obligations for high-impact and generative AI such as user notice, labeling, risk management and local representatives for foreign firms, backed by fines of up to 30 million won.
Prohibits certain harmful uses of AI-generated realistic digital imitations of individuals and provides civil actions and remedies for people injured by them.
Voluntary code that helps providers of generative AI systems mark and detect AI-generated content and helps deployers label deepfakes and certain AI-generated text, to meet Article 50(2), (4) and (5) of the AI Act.
Creates a Commissioner of Online Safety and Online Safety Commission that can direct takedowns and account restrictions for online harms such as intimate image abuse, doxxing and harassment, and creates statutory torts for victims.
Broad criminal justice Act that among other things creates offences for making, possessing or supplying AI tools designed to generate child sexual abuse images, possessing guidance on creating such images, and making or supplying purported intimate image (nudification) generators.
Requires social media companies to verify ages and obtain parental consent for minors' accounts, and expands child sexual abuse material crimes to cover computer-generated images.
Would create a federal intellectual property right protecting individuals' voice and visual likeness from unauthorized digital replicas, with notice and takedown rules for platforms.
Would require advertisements that use AI-generated synthetic content to disclose it, enforced as an unfair trade practice.
Would have set consent requirements for published sexual material, including synthetic depictions.
Omnibus crime law that, among many provisions, addresses generated obscene child sexual abuse material and explicit images of minors.
Criminal law bill that among other measures extends the offence of non-consensual distribution of intimate images to realistic fabricated depictions of an identifiable person, covering sexual deepfakes.
Government bill on the ethical use and governance of AI that requires deepfakes and AI-generated content to be clearly labelled and makes the Spanish AI Supervision Agency (AESIA) the default supervisory authority.
Would treat distributing AI-generated content without a required disclosure as an unfair method of competition enforceable by the Attorney General.
Prohibits using artificial intelligence to create child sexual abuse material.
Regulates the use of artificial intelligence in political campaign materials.
Would require providers of synthetic content creation systems to attach provenance data to AI-generated or modified content.
Sets safety protocols for AI chatbots with extra protections for minors, whistleblower protections for frontier AI developer employees, disclosure duties for AI products and labeling of AI-generated material.
Would address AI-generated images, including simulated child sexual abuse material, and identity fraud using replicas of a person.
Would prohibit the nonconsensual creation, possession and dissemination of nudified images.
Authorizes the State Administrator of Elections to act on credible reports of election misinformation or disinformation, including deepfakes, and sets related requirements; cross-filed with HB 145.
Makes it a crime to use artificial intelligence or deepfake representations of a person to commit identity fraud or cause physical injury, serious emotional distress or economic damage; cross-filed with HB 184.
Would have established and modified provisions relating to artificially generated material, including AI-generated depictions of minors.
Creates a civil action for people whose intimate images, whether real or deepfake, are intentionally disclosed without consent.
Would have created a criminal offense and civil penalties for disclosing intimate digital depictions of a person without consent.
Would have covered AI-generated child sexual abuse material and addressed related social media conduct.
Would have enacted an age-appropriate design code for minors, a private right of action over nonconsensual digital replicas and chatbot transparency rules.
Would have allowed a person to sue for damages when content generated or modified using artificial intelligence is not disclosed as such.
Revises criminal invasion of privacy law to prohibit creating and distributing digitally fabricated intimate materials of identifiable people.
Updates child sexual abuse material offenses to cover fabricated and AI-generated sexually explicit depictions of minors.
Would have created the criminal offense of digital identity fraud.
Revises video voyeurism law and increases the penalty for disclosing explicit synthetic media.
Requires providers of generative AI systems to include provenance disclosures in AI-created or AI-modified image, video and audio content and to offer tools to detect them.
Addresses counterfeit intimate images made with AI and sets digital content provenance standards so users can tell whether content was created or altered with AI.
Updates child sexual abuse material offenses to cover material generated or altered with artificial intelligence.
Regulates the use of synthetic media such as deepfakes in campaign advertising, including disclosure requirements.
Updates Washington's personality rights law to cover forged digital likenesses, including AI-generated voice and image replicas.
Would have regulated the use of synthetic media in campaign materials, with penalties.