Converting Energy into Intelligence: the Future of AI Technology, Human Discovery, and American Global Competitiveness
House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on the energy needs of AI and U.S. competitiveness.
556 on file · 318 became law · 142 still moving · 23 moved in 30 days
House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on the energy needs of AI and U.S. competitiveness.
Would create a federal right protecting individuals' voice and visual likeness from unauthorized AI generated digital replicas.
Prohibits the AI platform DeepSeek and other AI platforms controlled by a country of concern on state-owned devices and networks, and bars genetic sequencers or analysis software produced in a foreign adversary.
Declaration adopted at the Global AI Summit on Africa setting a shared African vision to use AI for economic competitiveness and to promote ethical, trustworthy and inclusive AI governance.
Establishes criminal penalties for producing or disseminating deceptive AI-generated audio or visual media, commonly called deepfakes.
Would have required developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination, with civil penalties enforced by the Attorney General.
Makes it a misdemeanor to distribute a deepfake of a candidate with intent to injure the candidate within a set period before an election unless it carries a disclosure.
Sets the rules for establishing and operating the AI Act scientific panel of independent experts that advises the AI Office, including on systemic risks from general-purpose AI models.
Sets Kenya's national AI plan built on three pillars: AI digital infrastructure, data and AI governance, and AI research, innovation and commercialisation.
Narrows the Artificial Intelligence Policy Act's generative AI disclosure duties to clear consumer requests and high-risk interactions in consumer transactions and regulated services.
Would regulate use of an individual's persona and prohibit certain deepfakes.
Regulates mental health chatbots that use AI, with disclosure, advertising and user data protections for Utah users.
Extends the repeal date of the Artificial Intelligence Policy Act.
Requires the Commonwealth Office of Technology to set AI policy standards and creates an Artificial Intelligence Governance Committee for state agency AI use, and creates a cause of action over undisclosed synthetic media in electioneering communications.
Would prohibit using artificial intelligence to dynamically set product prices.
Creates the Artificial Intelligence Regulation Task Force to study AI applications, risks and policy and report recommendations to the Legislature annually.
The D.C. Circuit held that the Copyright Act requires human authorship and upheld the Copyright Office's refusal to register a work created autonomously by an AI system.
Private member's bill by Lord Holmes of Richmond that would create an AI Authority and set principles for the regulation of artificial intelligence.
Would have enacted the Artificial Intelligence Act to regulate the development and deployment of artificial intelligence systems.
Extends Arkansas publicity rights to protect a person's photograph, voice, or likeness reproduced through artificial intelligence and used commercially.
Sets Colombia's national AI policy with 106 actions to 2030 across ethics and governance, data and infrastructure, research, skills and adoption, with an estimated investment of about COP 479,273 million.
Would have required disclosures and set penalties for synthetic media and AI used in political programming and campaign advertising.
Federal Council decision that Switzerland will ratify the Council of Europe AI Convention, amend Swiss law accordingly, and continue sector-specific AI regulation in areas such as health and transport.
Would have set limits on state and local regulation of artificial intelligence.
Would have required developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to use reasonable care to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination.
Non-binding Commission guidelines explaining how to determine whether a software system is an AI system within the scope of the AI Act.
Non-binding Commission guidelines with legal explanations and practical examples of the AI practices banned under Article 5 of the AI Act, such as harmful manipulation, social scoring and real-time remote biometric identification.
Would require deployers of high-risk AI systems to classify, assess and document them and to notify people when such systems influence consequential decisions, and would create an AI council and regulatory sandbox.
Declared a policy of sustaining U.S. AI dominance, ordered review of actions taken under Executive Order 14110 and required an AI action plan within 180 days.
Revoked dozens of prior executive orders, including Executive Order 14110 on safe, secure and trustworthy AI.
Set a government wide agenda for safe AI development, including reporting duties for developers of powerful models, NIST standards work and agency guidance.
Independent report led by Matt Clifford, adopted by the government, setting out 50 recommendations to expand AI infrastructure, drive AI adoption across the economy and improve public services.
Government bill that would have enacted the Consumer Privacy Protection Act, the Personal Information and Data Protection Tribunal Act and the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act; it died when Parliament was prorogued.
Prohibits certain uses of deepfakes and creates a private right of action for people harmed by them.
Affirms that international law applies across the life cycle of military AI capabilities and asks the Secretary-General to seek views of States on the opportunities and challenges of AI in the military domain and report to the 80th session.
Annual defense authorization law for fiscal year 2025 that includes provisions on Department of Defense artificial intelligence programs.
Requires state agencies to apply meaningful human review to automated decision-making systems that affect benefits or individual rights, conduct impact assessments and disclose the systems they use.
Would establish AI standards, metrics and evaluation work at NIST, including an AI Safety Institute, and support AI testbeds and research.
A Senate bill in Congress, now in committee. Latest step: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 727.
Calls on States to respect and protect the right to privacy in the digital age, including in the context of surveillance, data collection and the design, use and governance of artificial intelligence.
Senate version of the bill to establish the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource for shared AI research computing and data.
Replaces the 1985 product liability rules and extends no-fault liability for defective products to software, including AI systems, digital manufacturing files and related digital services.
Follows up resolution 78/241 by deciding to convene open informal consultations in New York in 2025 on lethal autonomous weapons systems, complementing the work of the Group of Governmental Experts under the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.
Creates a legal presumption of employment for people working through digital labour platforms and sets the first EU rules on algorithmic management, including human oversight of automated decisions and limits on processing workers' personal data.
Updates sexual exploitation of minor laws to cover realistic visual depictions created or modified with algorithms or artificial intelligence, and revises related sex crime provisions.
A House resolution in Congress, now in committee. Latest step: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Makes AI-generated and digitally altered sexual images of children child sexual abuse material and extends the unlawful dissemination of intimate images offense to deepfakes.
WTSA-24 resolution directing the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector to carry out standardization work on AI technologies in support of telecommunications and ICTs.
Makes it a crime to distribute a deceptive deepfake of a candidate or party within 90 days of an election unless it carries a disclosure.
Would have required developers of the largest frontier AI models to adopt safety and security protocols, assess risks of critical harms and be able to fully shut down covered models.