Introduced as a chatbot safety and data privacy bill, it was amended and enacted to direct the Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations to study regulating AI systems and generative AI chatbots.
Introduced to create a felony for training AI to encourage suicide or homicide, it was amended and enacted to direct the Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations to study AI and report by 2027-01-31.
Repeals and replaces the 2024 Colorado AI Act with notice, explanation, human review and correction rights for consumers affected by automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions.
Required developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to use reasonable care to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination in consequential decisions.
Council of Europe treaty requiring parties to ensure that activities across the life cycle of AI systems are consistent with human rights, democracy and the rule of law, entering into force after five ratifications including three Council of Europe member states.
Council decision concluding, on behalf of the European Union, the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, following the Commission proposal COM(2025) 265 and the consent of the European Parliament.
Authorizes the State Administrator of Elections to act on credible reports of election misinformation or disinformation, including deepfakes, and sets related requirements; cross-filed with HB 145.
Makes it a crime to use artificial intelligence or deepfake representations of a person to commit identity fraud or cause physical injury, serious emotional distress or economic damage; cross-filed with HB 184.
Special session version of the AI Bill of Rights that would have set AI consumer protections and limited government AI contracts with certain entities.
Clarifies that a person under Tennessee law does not include artificial intelligence, a computer algorithm, software, computer hardware or any machine.
Would have adopted the Transparency in Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Act, created a fund and changed provisions on records that may be withheld from the public.
Would have enacted the Artificial Intelligence Public Safety and Child Protection Transparency Act; it passed the House but not the Senate before the General Assembly adjourned.
Requires the Department of Education to survey AI use in public school instruction, publish AI safety guidance and run an AI innovation in education pilot program.
Would have enacted an age-appropriate design code for minors, a private right of action over nonconsensual digital replicas and chatbot transparency rules.
Would have required user accounts, age verification and parental consent for AI chatbot access, content blocking for minors and suicide-risk monitoring.
Directs the Joint Commission on Technology and Science to evaluate a framework for licensing independent verification organizations that assess AI models against safety best practices.
Requires operators of AI companions and companion platforms to notify users that they are interacting with artificial output and adds safeguards for users, including minors.
Expands the Division of Consumer Counsel's duties to receive and investigate consumer complaints involving emerging technologies, including AI fraud and abuse.
Would have required AI companion platforms and social media platforms to verify ages and obtain verifiable parental consent for children, with Attorney General enforcement and a private right of action.
Rewrites the RAISE Act's transparency and safety requirements for frontier AI developers and creates an office in the Department of Financial Services to oversee reporting of critical safety incidents.
Requires providers of generative AI systems to include provenance disclosures in AI-created or AI-modified image, video and audio content and to offer tools to detect them.
Addresses counterfeit intimate images made with AI and sets digital content provenance standards so users can tell whether content was created or altered with AI.
Danish law laying down supplementary national provisions to the EU AI Act; a replacement AI Act bill (L 111, 2025-26) giving market surveillance authorities inspection and fining powers lapsed when the parliamentary session ended.